Skip to content
Home » Updated SRA Guidance on High-Risk Third Countries

Updated SRA Guidance on High-Risk Third Countries

Historically, HRTCs were defined by the European Union. Following Brexit, the UK adopted its own list under Schedule 3ZA of the Money Laundering Regulations 2017 (MLR 2017). This changed on 22 January 2024, when the definition was updated to align with the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) lists:

  • High-risk jurisdictions subject to a call for action
  • Jurisdictions under increased monitoring

These lists are updated every February, June, and October, and firms must apply enhanced due diligence (EDD) under Regulation 33 when dealing with clients established in these jurisdictions.

Why Historic Designations Matter

A country’s removal from the high-risk list does not mean the risk disappears. Past designations often indicate structural weaknesses that criminals can exploit. For example:

  • Lao PDR was high-risk from 2016 to 2020, removed, and then re-added in February 2025.
  • This demonstrates that jurisdictions can fall back into non-compliance.

Firms should review historic client relationships and transactions involving previous HRTCs as part of ongoing monitoring under Regulation 28(11).

Find the full SRA guidance as of 4 December 2025 here.

Historic High-Risk Third Countries Table as of 4 December 2025 

Country Current HRTC? Date Added Date Removed
Afghanistan No 23 Sep 2016 26 Mar 2021
Albania No 26 Mar 2021 05 Dec 2023
Algeria Yes 25 Oct 2024
Angola Yes 25 Oct 2024
The Bahamas No 01 Oct 2020 26 Mar 2021
Barbados No 01 Oct 2020 23 Feb 2024
Bolivia Yes 13 Jun 2025
Bosnia and Herzegovina No 23 Sep 2016 09 Jul 2020
Botswana No 01 Oct 2020 02 Nov 2021
British Virgin Islands Yes 13 Jun 2025
Bulgaria Yes 05 Dec 2023
Burkina Faso No 26 Mar 2021 24 Oct 2025
Cambodia No 01 Oct 2020 27 Jun 2023
Cameroon Yes 05 Dec 2023
Cayman Islands No 26 Mar 2021 05 Dec 2023
Cote D’Ivoire Yes 25 Oct 2024
Croatia No 05 Dec 2023 13 Jun 2025
Democratic Republic of Congo Yes 15 Nov 2022
Ethiopia No 13 Feb 2018 09 Jul 2020
Ghana No 01 Oct 2020 13 Jul 2021
Gibraltar No 12 Jul 2022 23 Feb 2024
Guyana No 23 Sep 2016 09 Jul 2020
Haiti Yes 13 Jul 2021
Iran Yes 23 Sep 2016
Iraq No 23 Sep 2016 26 Mar 2021
Jamaica No 01 Oct 2020 28 Jun 2024
Jordan No 02 Nov 2021 05 Dec 2023
Kenya Yes 23 Feb 2024
Lao PDR Yes 23 Sep 2016 / Re-added 21 Feb 2025 09 Jul 2020
Lebanon Yes 25 Oct 2024
Mali No 02 Nov 2021 13 Jun 2025
Malta No 13 Jul 2021 12 Jul 2022
Mauritius No 01 Oct 2020 02 Nov 2021
Monaco Yes 28 Jun 2024
Mongolia No 01 Oct 2020 07 Feb 2021
Morocco No 26 Mar 2021 27 Jun 2023
Mozambique No 15 Nov 2022 24 Oct 2025
Myanmar Yes 01 Oct 2020
Namibia Yes 23 Feb 2024
Nepal Yes 21 Feb 2025
Nicaragua No 01 Oct 2020 15 Nov 2022
Nigeria No 05 Dec 2023 24 Oct 2025
North Korea Yes 23 Sep 2016
Pakistan No 22 Oct 2018 15 Nov 2022
Panama No 01 Oct 2020 05 Dec 2023
Philippines No 13 Jul 2021 21 Feb 2025
Senegal No 26 Mar 2021 25 Oct 2024
South Africa No 05 Dec 2023 24 Oct 2025
South Sudan Yes 13 Jul 2021
Sri Lanka No 06 Mar 2018 09 Jul 2020
Syria Yes 23 Sep 2016
Tanzania No 15 Nov 2022 13 Jun 2025
Trinidad and Tobago No 06 Mar 2018 26 Mar 2021
Tunisia No 06 Mar 2018 09 Jul 2020
Turkey No 02 Nov 2021 28 Jun 2024
Uganda No 23 Sep 2016 23 Feb 2024
United Arab Emirates No 29 Mar 2022 23 Feb 2024
Vanuatu No 23 Sep 2016 26 Mar 2021
Venezuela Yes 28 Jun 2024
Vietnam Yes 05 Dec 2023
Yemen Yes 23 Sep 2016
Zimbabwe No 01 Oct 2020 29 Mar 2022

Best Practice for Firms

To stay compliant and mitigate risk:

  • Monitor transactions involving previous HRTCs
  • Apply a risk-based approach to overseas transactions
  • Update policies regularly in line with FATF changes

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *